Older Supreme Court rulings make Judge Malihi’s ruling invalid and a conflict of judicial process

Judge Malihi burns our Constitution Satire by Brian D. Hill of USWGO. Credit for the images used for this satire by various sources and a mainstream media outlet

Author: Brian D. Hill

A 1875 Supreme Court ruling invalidates Georgia Administrative Hearings Judge Malihi, that still stands today as any court ruling by the Supreme Court unless Unconstitutional is valid and should be used as an example for any court across the country that is also under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Constitution.

So what was in the 1875 ruling and what was the name that identifies the ruling?

Minor v. Happersett

Supreme Court Federal building in Washington D.C., photo by Brian D. Hill and taken around October 2011

According to this ruling it states that “Natural Born Citizen” was defined as children born of two U.S. citizens – regardless of the location of the birth. It found: “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.”

So according to this Supreme Court ruling, that all courts including state courts that follow the U.S. Constitution have to follow, Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen according to the facts that Obama and even his attorney did not show up at the court trial in Georgia to address his accusers and fight back against the accusations against him, Obama didn’t confront the witnesses in court against him, and all the evidence including one of Obama’s own books proves that he is not a valid natural born citizen and cannot be allowed to become president of the United States of America. The facts alone that Obama and his attorney did not show up is a default judgment in itself but Orly Taitz, David Farrar, and other attorneys involved wanted the evidence to be on the record so it’s all on public record and is proven.

So if the Georgia court did rule that Obama isn’t a natural born citizen and upper courts decided to rule the same way then all laws Obama signed, all executive orders under Obama, treaties signed, orders given to military bases, judges and justices appointed, Obamacare, and any and all other decisions made by the sitting president would be tossed out and null and void.

In fact any laws passed that violate the U.S. Constitution are all null and void according to another Supreme Court ruling.

Marbury Vs. Madison

According to this 1803 Supreme Court Ruling, and thousands of other rulings which I will get into later if time permits, it states that “All Laws which are Repugnant to the Constitution are Null and Void.” The same thing can be argued for the President that if he is not naturally born then any laws he passed and lobbied, etc etc are null and void since he is not legally eligible he would be treated as though he wasn’t ever a legitimate president and any executive decrees he made would not, should not, and must not be enforceable by any law enforcer whatsoever.

Buzz this!