Other Georgia State Judges refuse to put out an opinion about Obama Eligibility ruling

Author: Brian D. Hill

As an investigative journalist I’ve decided to investigate the suspicious Malihi ruling by the Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings, which Judge Michael Malihi is a Deputy Chief. With the older Supreme Court ruling that states that a natural born U.S. citizen has to have both parents that are U.S. citizens, Obama and his attorney never even attended the trial in Georgia in January, the three attorneys including Orly Taitz put all the valid and correct evidence proving Obama is ineligible to be president, then why did Judge Michael Malihi made the ruling that Obama was a natural born U.S. citizen when all the evidence shows the total opposite of his ruling?

Even with my Righthaven court case in Colorado I was forced to send a motion to dismiss or answers to the summons and the judge would make a order on whether I would be forced to attend the Colorado Court trial or not if my case was still going. So why did Obama get the easy chair in the court ruling? Why did Obama get off the judicial hook? Should I decide to not respond to any future  judicial orders and use Obama’s actions set examples as why?

So I decided to email other judges within the Judge Directory as an investigative journalist to find out what their opinion is on the corrupt Georgia Obama Eligibility ruling by Malihi?

This is a copy of the email template sent to at least 5 judges excluding Malihi. I even explained to them that I was a member of the press and had some questions for them.

Hello (Legal assistant of the judge),

These few set of questions is for Judge (Name of judge goes here)  as I am a member of the press, of USWGO Alternative News, and I wish to get professional opinions and the only professional opinions I can get for the type of questions I am asking is only from judges as they have the expertize in law and how rulings work. I am not asking for legal advise, I am not trying to undermine the judicial branch, but am simply trying to find out the truth with this request as it is very critical as America is falling apart by design and needs a truthful media outlet now more then ever.

I like to ask another judges opinion on the ruling by Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi. The judge ruled that candidate Barack Obama was a natural born citizen under the U.S. Constitution even though his father is and was not a U.S. citizen and is still a foreigner. An older Supreme Court ruling stated that a president has to have both parents to be citizens of the United States before the president can be legally allowed to become the president due to the corruption and espionage that breeds out of foreigners ruling the American presidency and selling out our country to foreign countries violating Americas national security.

As a member of the press it is my right and duty to find out the truth even if it takes so much of my own valuable time to find out why Judge Malihi would make such a senseless ruling that doesn’t seem valid to me as it screams in my head that it is not a valid ruling as I have been in a lawsuit so I slightly know how the court system works.

So here is a few questions.

So what would you have ruled if you were the judge presiding in the Georgia candidate Eligibility case?

Would you consider the evidence that Dr. Orly Taitz, Mr. David Farrar, and the other attorney involved presented or would throw it out?

Would you have also considered that Obama didn’t even show up at the trial at all?

Would you have ruled that both the persons parents have to be U.S. citizens before that person can become president of the United States as what is required by the U.S. Constitution and older Supreme Court rulings that rules that the presidents parents have to both be U.S. citizens at the time he/she becomes president?

Any questions you decide to answer will be used in our news article about the ruling being controversial and may or may not be valid. We are asking other judges as well much like a poll type of thing where I will tally how many judges would have ruled in Obama’s favor even though he provided absolutely no evidence and how many would rule in favor of the plaintiffs that have provided evidence and used the defendants own book against them admitting guilty.

Sincerely,
Brian D. Hill
Admin, Founder, webmaster, and head reporter of USWGO Alternative News (uswgo.com)
Reporter of FederalJack.com and We Are Change
admin  @  uswgo.com

I was shocked at all the responses I got back were all a negative. None of them would even dare to answer my questions and didn’t care about the corrupt and incorrect court ruling by Former Iranian judge, Michael Malihi. Of course it looks as though the judges themselves didn’t reject my request but it was their legal assistant that manages the emails since they fear a conflict of interest even though ruling in Obama’s favor even with no evidence to back him up is a definite sign of a conflict of interest.

It didn’t matter to their staff that I was a member of the press, it doesn’t matter that I was asking questions. All I got in return from almost all of them were this:

Please visit our website at www.osah.ga.gov

The staff of the Office of State Administrative Hearings is not authorized to give legal advice.

We also do not accept any motions, requests and/or messages embedded in an email. You may prepare and file a motion and proof of service pursuant to A.R.P. Rules 4 and 16 electronically by attaching them to an e-mail in either Word or PDF format. You are required to serve the motion in accordance with A.R.P. Rule 11. Your motion and the response, if any, will be presented to the Judge for his/her consideration. Once an Order is issued by the Judge, a copy of the Order will be sent to all parties or their counsel of record.

For your convenience, below is a link to our procedural rules:

http://www.osah.ga.gov/documents/procedures/administrative-rules-osah.pdf.

For your convenience, below is a link to a Proof of Service form:

http://www.osah.ga.gov/documents/motions/Proof%20of%20Service.pdf.

Then the last one of them I got was that “Judge Gatto is no longer employed with the Office of State Administrative Hearings.” by Melvina Bolston the legal assistant. That does not make sense if he truly isn’t working at the Office of State Administrative hearings then why is he still in the Judge Directory? I even have a screenshot taken less then 30 minutes ago that Judge Gatto is still employed and no evidence shows that he is no longer working there.

If Judge Gatto doesn't work at the court then why is he still in the Judicial Directory and nothing tells the online web user that he is no longer employed or that he is now a former employee?

Something tells me the other judges were also threatened if they take any action for the completely out of line court ruling by Judge Malihi that complete embarrasses the judicial system and turns it into a Joke.

The Judicial system is now officially a joke and will now only be used a tool of oppression against the poor, Middle Class, and defenseless. Obama is a dictator and can do whatever he wants even kill people and never be held accountable. Obama is now an emperor and will continue to dissolve the republic until the old remnants of the republic are swept away.

The judicial branch was suppose to stand up to intimidation and keep the executive branch and legislative branch in check to prevent a dictatorship but more and more the other three branches are merging into the executive branch. All Obama needs is to pass a legal declaration that will dissolve the other two branches of Government and the official military dictatorship will begin…

Buzz this!