President Obama and the White House attacks Insurance Companies yet what about Obama’s past?
March 10, 2010 by Brian D. Hill
Filed under Featured Showcase, U.S News
Author: Brian D. Hill
Date: March 10 2010
Photos:
The screen shot of the YouTube Page has copyrighted logos belonging to Google. All trademark and copyrighted information, and logos within these screenshots and photos are all by their respectful copyright owners and are all released under Fair Use for non commercial and educational usage.
All sources are included within the original articles links within the page, if you cannot access those links or if links have been stripped out then go to the original news site of the article at uswgo.com.
(USWGO Alt. News Brian D. Hill)According to CNN the White House including President Barack H. Obama and Kathleen Sebelius, the Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States of America is now attacking the Insurance Companies, and on youtube the message is being brought out about their plans on the controversial Health Care Reform.
The White House and their staff seems to attack the Insurance Companies and preach about reforming the Health Care system but what off their past that makes the whole noble deed questionable, well according to the World Socialist Web Site (WSWS), a quote from article writer Kate Randall said “the health care industry is pumping in record amounts of cash to the politicians involved.”, and also stated “The health care legislation taking shape reflects these interests. Through the so-called individual mandate, Americans will be required to purchase insurance, boosting the already burgeoning profits of the health insurance companies.”. Now as I looked at the Washington Examiner seeing if the health care bill still made it mandatory to buy a insurance (private or federalized) policy of $15,000 or more or you will be fined and sent to prison it looks like that portion hasn’t even been removed and yet Obama and the White House are attacking the Health Insurance companies and yet they seem to craft in the bill that you have to buy expensive insurance or goto prison. Also the Washington Examiner has also brought out in their opinion Editorial that the Virginia state legislature has decided to craft a bill overthrowing, Obamas health care reform plan, which mandates you buy private or federal insurance or go to prison, in the state of Virginia.
Also back to what the World Socialist Website said about the fact that record amounts of cash are being pumped by lobbyists into the politicians hands which breeds political corruption in a country that is suppose to be run by the people, says the Declaration of Independence, and the U.S. Constitution. So the fact Obama and the Capital wants to craft a health care Reform bill that has been supported by lobbyists that have bribed out politicians in record amounts, requires we all have to buy a $15,000 insurance policy or get fined and goto prison, even if some Americans are completely healthy and require no health insurance, and takes away our rights to make our own choices and that mandates the Federal Government to dictate what kind and expensive of insurance and health care I and other Americans, are going to pay for.
Also according to a Fact Check Video Obama has been accepting money that he shouldn’t have taken from ex lobbyists, ex Donars, PACs, and their wives which shows you that Obama isn’t exactly a innocent President looking to restore our health care from it’s horrors. If you don’t believe me do some research on those lobbying Obama and him accepting it and I’m sure you will see a whole new wide to him you haven’t seen.
So factcheck which is suppose to be the totally factual source that brings out no conspiracy theories and everything on there is fact claims that Obama did accept money but by using loopholes and exceptions. This means that this whole health care reform is nothing but a sham but some Americans still don’t accept it and are cheering for Obamas health care reform without checking all the evidence and history of Obama and his czars because they believe it’s all republican propaganda but I don’t believe we should just diss everything I brought out as republican propaganda and Factcheck is one of them exposing some of Obamas high end corruptions.
Also according to what comes from a alternative news site Prison Planet, a discovery on whats in the headache of the huge health care reform bill I will bring out a very large quote from their site about whats all in the bill that many people fear under this health care reform bill. You can skip this if you already know whats in the bill or if you just want to read the rest of my article.
Employer Mandate Excise Tax (Page 275): If an employer does not pay 72.5 percent of a single employee’s health premium (65 percent of a family employee), the employer must pay an excise tax equal to 8 percent of average wages. Small employers (measured by payroll size) have smaller payroll tax rates of 0 percent (<$500,000), 2 percent ($500,000-$585,000), 4 percent ($585,000-$670,000), and 6 percent ($670,000-$750,000).
Individual Mandate Surtax (Page 296): If an individual fails to obtain qualifying coverage, he must pay an income surtax equal to the lesser of 2.5 percent of modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) or the average premium. MAGI adds back in the foreign earned income exclusion and municipal bond interest.
Medicine Cabinet Tax (Page 324): Non-prescription medications would no longer be able to be purchased from health savings accounts (HSAs), flexible spending accounts (FSAs), or health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs). Insulin excepted.
Cap on FSAs (Page 325): FSAs would face an annual cap of $2500 (currently uncapped).
Increased Additional Tax on Non-Qualified HSA Distributions (Page 326): Non-qualified distributions from HSAs would face an additional tax of 20 percent (current law is 10 percent). This disadvantages HSAs relative to other tax-free accounts (e.g. IRAs, 401(k)s, 529 plans, etc.)
Denial of Tax Deduction for Employer Health Plans Coordinating with Medicare Part D (Page 327): This would further erode private sector participation in delivery of Medicare services.
Surtax on Individuals and Small Businesses (Page 336): Imposes an income surtax of 5.4 percent on MAGI over $500,000 ($1 million married filing jointly). MAGI adds back in the itemized deduction for margin loan interest. This would raise the top marginal tax rate in 2011 from 39.6 percent under current law to 45 percent—a new effective top rate.
Excise Tax on Medical Devices (Page 339): Imposes a new excise tax on medical device manufacturers equal to 2.5 percent of the wholesale price. It excludes retail sales and unspecified medical devices sold to the general public.
Corporate 1099-MISC Information Reporting (Page 344): Requires that 1099-MISC forms be issued to corporations as well as persons for trade or business payments. Current law limits to just persons for small business compliance complexity reasons. Also expands reporting to exchanges of property.
Delay in Worldwide Allocation of Interest (Page 345): Delays for nine years the worldwide allocation of interest, a corporate tax relief provision from the American Jobs Creation Act
Limitation on Tax Treaty Benefits for Certain Payments (Page 346): Increases taxes on U.S. employers with overseas operations looking to avoid double taxation of earnings.
Codification of the “Economic Substance Doctrine” (Page 349): Empowers the IRS to disallow a perfectly legal tax deduction or other tax relief merely because the IRS deems that the motive of the taxpayer was not primarily business-related.
Application of “More Likely Than Not” Rule (Page 357): Publicly-traded partnerships and corporations with annual gross receipts in excess of $100 million have raised standards on penalties. If there is a tax underpayment by these taxpayers, they must be able to prove that the estimated tax paid would have more likely than not been sufficient to cover final tax liability.
In addition to the list of taxes for in the ATR report, our people found the following:
Employer FINE Under Mandated Excise Tax (Page 310): A $100 per day excise tax imposed on employers for each employee for whom employer fails to “satisfy the health coverage participation requirements”. Excise tax will not apply if Secretary determines even after “exercising reasonable diligence” employer was unaware of employee’s lack of participation in health coverage.
“CADILLAC” INSURANCE PLANS
Credit vs. Points (Pages 318-320) This portion gives the appearance of providing a temporary two-year credit while at the same time deducting “points” if the Secretary deems that the employer is too generous with its health care benefit package. Ex. p. 319, lines 11-18: “Credit not allowed with respect to certain highly compensated employees. No credit shall be determined under subsection (a) with respect to qualified employee health coverage expenses paid or incurred with respect to any employee for any taxable year if the aggregate compensation paid by the employer to such employee during such taxable year exceeds $80,000”.
MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT
Uncompensated Care Increase (Page 389-390) Page 389, lines 14-19 detail a “significant” decrease in uninsurance will be triggered by only 8% decrease – “There is a “significant” decrease in the national rate of uninsurance as the result of this Act” if there is a decrease in the national rate of uninsurance from 2012 to 2014 that exceeds 8 percentage points.” Page 390, lines 4-9 detail the increase in uncompensated care – “For each fiscal year (beginning with 2017) , the Secretary shall estimate the aggregate reduction in the amount of Medicare DSH payment that would be expected to result from the adjustment under paragraph (1)(A)”. This, in turn, will lower payments to hospitals in reimbursement rates.
Gov’t to legislate Pain Research, page 1493 line 14
Begins with Line 14 ‘‘SEC. 409J. PAIN RESEARCH.
This section covers research that will be conducted at National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Provides for a “Pain Consortium” and a committee to be known as “Interagency Pain Research Coordinating Committee”
page 1496 describes the attributes of committee members (6 members are scientists, physicians, other health professionals while another 6 members are from general public representatives from leading in research, advocacy and service organizations for individuals with pain-related conditions)
This committee will coordinate all efforts within the Department of Health and Human Services and other Federal agencies that relate to pain research. Appears to be a decision making board on treatment protocols (could rationing be involved here?), create a public awareness campaign on pain,
page 1501
15 AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—For
16 purposes of carrying out this section, there are authorized
17 to be appropriated $2,000,000 for fiscal year 2011 and
18 $4,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2012 and 2015.’’.
Employer Excise Tax (Pages 313-317): If an employer chooses not to provide health insurance to employees, an excise tax on the total wages paid is imposed on the employer. The excise tax percentage ranges from 2% of total payroll of $500,000 to 8% of payroll of $750,000 or more. If an employer has less than $500,000 annual payroll, he pays no excise tax.
Employer Health Coverage Tax Credit (Pages 317-319): Small business owners receive a tax credit of 50% of health insurance paid for employees whose wages are $20,000 or less per year when the employer has 10 or fewer employees. The tax credit is prorated as the amount of wages increases, leaving no tax credit for the employer when such employee’s wages total $80,000 or more per year.
For employers with more than 10 employees, the tax credit calculated by the proratio shall be reduced by an amount in the ratio of 10 to total number of employees.
SEC. 1416. Ensuring Staffing Accountability
(a) Skilled Nursing Facilities
(b) Nursing Facilities
Page #: 822 – 826
Subject: privacy
Remarks:
This section of the bill calls for an amendment to the Social Security Act “(C) Submission of Staffing Information Based on Payroll Data in a Uniform Format.”
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall require a skilled nursing facility to electronically submit to the Secretary direct care staffing information including agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format (GE?) (as established by the Secretary in consultation with among others, consumer advocacy groups (ACORN?))
GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF CARE AND RESEARCH
*Government Panel for Senior Care Decisions (Pages 649-661): The Secretary has the right to waive requirements of the Social Security Act Titles XI & XVIII. These providers will put together patient decisions aids and share in seniors’ decisions regarding their health care. Seniors will attend counseling provided by said panel. Compensation will be granted to providers who generate less cost for care with regards to Parts A and B of Medicare.
Government Legislation of Pain Research (Pages 1493-1501): Page 1496 describes the attributes of committee members (6 members are scientists, physicians, other health professionals while another 6 members are from general public representatives from leading in research, advocacy and service organizations for individuals with pain-related conditions). This committee will coordinate all efforts within the Department of Health and Human Services and other Federal agencies that relate to pain research. Appears to be a decision making board on treatment protocols, create a public awareness campaign on pain. Ramifications include overly regulated treatment protocols for chronic pain and the possible end result of rationing. The viability of private research is questioned in light of this section.
(Page 1501): Lines 15-18 establish the authorization of appropriations – “For purposes of carrying out this section, there are authorized to be appropriated $2,000,000 for fiscal year 2011 and $4,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2012 and 2015”.
Government Regulation of Staffing in Nursing Facilities (Pages 822-826): In a specific motion to alter state authority of nursing facilities and to provide the Secretary and consumer advocacy groups with overreaching authority, this section of the bill calls for an amendment to the Social Security Act “(C) Submission of Staffing Information Based on Payroll Data in a Uniform Format.” The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall require a skilled nursing facility to electronically submit to the Secretary direct care staffing information including agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format as established by the Secretary in consultation with among others, consumer advocacy groups.
Government Authority in Determining Medical Home Models (Pages 680-690): Secretary is provided wide latitude to fund and create both independent and community-based medical home models in order to reward physicians and others to coordinate treatment for chronically ill patients in underserved (rural) areas. Patient need not designate a doctor as their caregiver.
NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE CORPS
Sec. 2201
Obligated Service Requirement (Page 1220): “The entity and the Corps member agree in writing that the Corps member will perform half-time clinical practice”. Essentially, this details “those individuals who have entered into a contract for obligated service under the Scholarship Program or Loan Repayment Program un which the individuals are authorized to satisfy the requirement of obligated service through providing clinical practice”. Essentially these individuals are obliged to work off debt in this capacity.
ABORTION
Abortion Coverage (Page 110): “Nothing in this Act shall be construed as preventing the public health insurance option from providing for or prohibiting coverage of services described in paragraph (4)(A)”. Paragraph (4)(A) Abortion Services – Abortions for which public funding is prohibited. That said, paragraph (4)(B) “The services described in this subparagraph are for abortions for which the expenditure of Federal funds appropriated for the Department of Health and Human Services is permitted.”
GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF INDUSTRYHealth Czar (Page 133): Establishes Health Czar and bureaucracy, i.e. “Health Choices Commissioner” and “Health Choices Administration”. Essentially, this area lends the Health Commissioner and Health Choices Administration power over health insurance plans both inside and outside of the Health Insurance Exchange. The concern is that the provision invites overreaching authority and oversight of plans specifically set up to provide timely and needed care not readily available through the government exchange-controlled plans.
Health Czar Health Plan Audits (Page 133-134) Provides “Health Commissioner”/Czar with wide discretion to audit “qualified health benefits plans” and then bill the plan for the cost of the audit, regardless of grounds for the audit and regardless of whether or not the plan was found to have violated any regulation. The concern is the overreaching of authority and power over private health plans and the conjecture is that this will force a process by which consumers are significantly limited in their health plan choices. As written, no protection from abuse of power in this regard is provided.
Word/Topic Reviewed: Subtitle E—Public Reporting on Health Care-Associated Infections
SEC. 1138A. REQUIREMENT FOR PUBLIC REPORTING BY HOSPITALS AND AMBULATORY SURGICAL CENTERS ON HEALTH CARE-ASSOCIATED INFECTIONS.
This section is vaguely disturbing in the way it micro-manages hospitals, a vast overreach of federal power, but that’s nothing surprising in this bill. Two specific red flags:
Sub-topic (b)(2).
Page #. 915Paragraph #. 2
Subject: 02, 03
Remarks: Infections are to be publicly posted and compared by demographic information. (Age? Race?)
Sub-topic (c)(4).
Page #. 916
Paragraph #. 2
Subject: 03, 04
Remarks: Infections are being studied in such detail in order to reduce costs, not because of quality of care concerns
Government Regulatio of Patient Care
Regulation of Services (Page 383) Lines 11-16 allot for using appropriate indicators for non-therapy ancillary services classification, which may include age, physical and mental status, ability to perform activities of daily living, etc. The concern is over the method of deciding care delivery, placing key decision-making elements in the hands of politicians and other non-medical staff as opposed to the hands of patients’ doctors and families.
Regulation on Patient Stay (Page 385) Establishes payment based on total costs during stay in a skilled nursing facility as opposed to the number of days in such stay.
ABORTION
Abortion Coverage (Page 110): “Nothing in this Act shall be construed as preventing the public health insurance option from providing for or prohibiting coverage of services described in paragraph (4)(A)”. Paragraph (4)(A) Abortion Services – Abortions for which public funding is prohibited. Paragraph (4)(B) “The services described in this subparagraph are for abortions for which the expenditure of Federal funds appropriated for the Department of Health and Human Services is permitted.”
Federal Funding of Abortion (Page 147) Lines 14-(1) IN GENERAL.—“Nothing in this Act shall be construed to have any effect on Federal laws regarding – (A) conscience protection; (B) willingness or refusal to provide abortion; (C) discrimination on the basis of the willingness or refusal to provide, pay for, cover, or refer for abortion or to provide or participate in training to provide abortion. The concern regards lines 20-23 (C) as it is viewed as a potential open door for funding of organizations such as Planned Parenthood. The document affirms that this bill has no effect on current law where discrimination based on either willingness or refusal to participate in abortion services, and thus, provides no additional protect against the use of Federal funds allocated for abortion services. As, additionally, the Hyde Amendment is in no way incorporated into this piece of legislation and because no additional explicit protections exist in this document, this piece of legislation will, indeed, provide authorization of federal funding of abortion under the public option.
Additionally, because there is no ban on abortion funding under the reauthorization of the Indian Health Service (IHS), and additionally no additional protections such as the Vitter Amendment, there is nothing to prevent abortion funding.
Mandated School-Based Health Clinics (Page 1354) Lines 9-21 states, “(c) Use of Funds – Funds awarded under a grant under this section …(2) may not be used to provide abortions. However, there is no specific language prohibiting either abortion referrals or the distribution of information materials regarding access to abortion.
Required Reporting Regarding Infections Sec. 1138A – Requirement for public reporting by hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers on health care-associated infections. Page 915 – States, “infections are to be publicly posted and compared by demographic information.” Page 916 – States “infections are being studied in such detail in order to reduce costs, not because of quality of care concerns”. The concern stems from both the ambiguity that exists in the statement referenced on page 915 as well as the lack of concern over quality of care in regards to infection.
Required Reporting Trumps State Laws Sec. 1128H – Financial reports on physicians’ financial relationships with manufacturers and distributors of covered drugs, devices, biologicals or medical supplies under Medicare, Medicaid, or CHIP and with entities that bill for services under Medicare. Page 910 – Concerns is that language pre-empts state laws requiring manufacturers to report their relationships to physicians. Page 912 – Establishes that “Comptroller General” is to file a report establishing that no loopholes exist in said section.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF NON-HEALTH INDUSTRY
Regulation of Disclosure of Nutrient Content/Menu Variability (Page 1514) Lines 5-14 – “The Secretary shall establish by regulation standards for determining and disclosing the nutrient content for standard menu items that come in different flavors, varieties, or combinations, but which are listed as a single menu item, such as soft drinks, ice cream, pizza, doughnuts, or children’s combination meals, through means determined by the Secretary, including ranges, averages, or other methods”. Rules extend to maintaining the calculation of combo meals an addition cost to restaurants.
Regulation of Vending Machine Owners/Suppliers (Page 1516) Lines 4-8 – Pertaining to businesses that own or operation 20 or more vending machines, “the vending machine operator shall provide a sign in close proximity to each article of food or the selection button that included a clear and conspicuous statement disclosing the number of calories contained in the article”.
Regulation of Food Preparation/Presentation (Page 1517) Lines 14-22 – “The Secretary shall (aa) consider standardization of recipes and methods of preparation, reasonable variation in serving size and formulation of menu items, space on menus and menu boards, inadvertent human error, training of food service workers, variations in ingredients, and other factors, as the Secretary determines”.
Pg. 1601
19 solved with reasonable premium increases
PG 1555
lines 1 through 7 and no such
5 information or documentary material may be
6 made public
‘‘(E) ENFORCEMENT.—
14 ‘‘(i) CIVIL PENALTY.—Any person
15 that violates a provision of this paragraph
16 shall be liable for a civil penalty of not
17 more than $11,000 for each day on which
18 the violation occurs.
Pg. 1624
5 (2) PERSONAL CARE ATTENDANT WORKFORCE
6 ADVISORY PANEL.—Section 202 of such Act (42
7 U.S.C. 3012)
Pg. 1800
22 ‘‘(3) PEER REVIEW PANELS18 ‘‘(e) PEER REVIEW PANELS.—The Secretary may
19 provide for the establishment of peer review panels, as nec20
essary, to review and evaluate applications using the cri21
teria developed pursuant to subsection (d)
Pg. 1805
12 ‘‘SEC. 307. LAND TRANSFER
15 departments of the United States are authorized to transfer, at
16 no cost, land and improvements to the Service
Pg. 1584
11 paid into a Life Independence Account for ob
12 taining assistance with decisionmaking
13concerning medical care
See attachment for a compilation of what’s been found so far on p. 110-200. Some highlights:
p. 110 (4) (B) Federal funding for abortion is in;
p. 111 Sec. 223 “Health Benefits Advisory Committee” to recommend covered benefits (AKA “rationing board”)
p. 120-130 HHS Sec. directed to clarify/define several bits in this section (reader found 50+ calls for Sec. to clarify/define, including in rest of bill)
p.133-134 “Health Choices Administration” with power over health insurance plans both inside and outside the Health Insurance Exchange invites harassment of non-Exchange plans and abuse aimed at driving private plans out of business.
Lots more where these tidbits came from in the attachment. Will get to work collating any reports which may have come in since 4:30PM Central Time today as soon as I post this.
Pages 1850 – 1860 Titled “HEALTH SERVICES FOR URBAN INDIANS” contains a lot of double talk. What it summarily says in plain English is that the Secretary now controls and approves any and all grants and/or contracts entered into or referred by an Indian Tribe, Urban Indians or Tribal Organizations, including but not limited to healthcare needs, education of any kind, desease prevention, wild life preservation, land preservation or land purchases, and anything else covered under the 1921 Snyder Act. I specifically found it interesting that on page 1860, lines 14-23, the purpose of a contract or grant…shall be the determination… in order to assist the Secretary in assessing the health status and health care needs of Urban Indians in the Urban Center involved and determining whether the Secretary should enter into a contract or make a grant…
ADDITIONAL ITEM RELATED TO INDIAN HEALTH:Septic System Regulations (Pages 1780-1790) The Federal government will fund sanitation facilities for Indian Tribes with the following provisions: (Page1781) “Sec. 302 (a) (1) financial and technical assistance to operate and maintain sanitation facilities…. (a) (3) funding to operate and maintain sanitation facilities….(b) Congress reaffirms the primary responsibility and authority of the Service to provide the necessary sanitation facilities and services as provided in section 7 of the Act of August 5, 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2004a)…..(Page 1783) – (c) (5) fund up to 100% of a tribes loan for sanitation facility….…(Page 1785)(c) (8) the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall, by regulation, establish standards applicable to the planning, design, and construction of sanitation facilities funded under this Act… (Page 1787) (d) The financial and technical capability of an Indian Tribe, Tribal Organization, or Indian community to safely operate, manage, and maintain a sanitation facility shall not be a prerequisite to the provision or construction of sanitation facilities by the Secretary”. It is posited that this item is a necessary item for the bill as septic-related issues directly affect health issues for the Indian Community. However, it is a concern that this is transition of power overrides local standards for the Indian Community and usurps local authority over key community infrastructure and systems. It is worthy to note, as well, that sanitation needs include a clean water source which involves a myriad of issues related to clean water and environmental concerns.
So according to all of this the Controversial Health Care reform bill will mandate more Federal authority over our very lives, will give more individual power away from the individual and give it to the Federal Centralized Government under the guise of reforming our Health Care and put an end to the greedy insurance companies.
When you read the old bill that got shoved into the trash and the new Health care reform bill, they both seem exactly alike, plus they also demonstrate that the Federal Government will have more power over our finances, can mandate forced drugging (More like mandated buying from drug dealers) and forced vaccinations under the guise of making health care cheaper for all and use less taxes, it could even give the federal Government and the strong arm mainstream medias under the Federal governments power the rights to eventually putting out ads about how getting rid of the baby boomers would lower taxes used by Obamas health care reform plan, would dictate more of the lives of the American people, and will further violate the U.S. Constitution under the guise of a welfare or free health care state.
This health care bill needs to be reexamined and the whole country needs to get together to discuss the matters of health care reform to see of a better way to reform health care and not have the Federal Government run our private lives which many would fight to the death to refuse. Instead of discussing the issue many town hall meetings became nothing but biased and propaganda for the pro health care reformers without looking for better solutions to the problems which leads health care reform to not just stay controversial but to become unacceptable for a free country such as ours.
Also another act of corruption for this health care reform was at the town hall meetings some to many of those there were paid to go there, according to a ad at craigslist, it states you can earn anywhere from $400 to $600 a week to support and be at the town hall meetings over health care reform which is the biggest baloney to not only our democracy but to freedom and liberty itself, also I would never ever bribe for my cause as the health care reform does because I would protect the true power of democracy instead of money ruling all laws instead of the people as the Declaration of Independence says. Also that ad also states that “Build support for health care reform with U.S. PIRG. Mobilize activists to cut the cost of health care, expand coverage, and stop sick from getting dropped by insurance companies. Go out in your community and make change happen. Make friends and money ($$$) along the way.”
How is that not bribing or political corruption, I would understand paying for just the gas money for those that can’t afford to make it but actually Paying people for Health Care reform? Health care is a growing issue not to be solved with bribery or benefiting those that agree with a certain cause because that overthrows the whole point of We The People rule and democracy all together.
Democracy is about thinking about the issues then getting our government to protect and support those issues instead of bribing and paying people to care for a issue. Issues are very important and should not be sold with a buck or a threat. Democracy is about learning about all the issues and state your reasons why you fight for this issue and why the government should take your issue into importance. What ever happened to democracy? because every since Barack H. Obama got in there I have been seeing troll attacks, hundreds to thousands of good rule abiding YouTube videos being removed for terms of service violations or violating the community guide lines, including preach Manning of Atlahworldwide. I have also seen organizations asking people against the controversial and biased health care reform to attack their comment boards and I’ve seen people call me racist or believing that I’m republican and even took the liberty to remove some of my good articles on current TVs website after being called a racist several times and even accused of supporting the Insurance companies, and many decided to ignore my wisdom and sites like mine simply because I was against this fraudulent health care reform bill which never served the purpose of a true democracy but bribed it’s way into power.
I hope we can discuss the real issues and not pay people to go to Town Hall meetings, and then under those circumstances I will feel better about this health care reform instead of just feeling depressed that this thing will pass.
![]() |
Buzz this! |


























President Obama and the White House attacks Insurance Companies … · Legal News – Your Source for Legal News and Advice on Wed, 10th Mar 2010 10:01 pm
[...] Here is the original post: President Obama and the White House attacks Insurance Companies … [...]
President Obama and the White House attacks Insurance Companies … · Job News on Wed, 10th Mar 2010 10:43 pm
[...] See the article here: President Obama and the White House attacks Insurance Companies … [...]
President Obama and the White House attacks Insurance Companies … Compare on me on Thu, 11th Mar 2010 12:13 am
[...] the original post: President Obama and the White House attacks Insurance Companies … tags: brian, care-staffing, cnn, health, human, human-services, kathleen, secretary, [...]
President Obama and the White House attacks Insurance Companies … | CraftRetailing.Com on Thu, 11th Mar 2010 2:48 am
[...] Read more here: President Obama and the White House attacks Insurance Companies … [...]
Anonymous Coward on Sun, 14th Mar 2010 12:06 pm
Hey I like your site so much that I just bookmarked it….
President Obama and the White House attacks Insurance Companies yet what about Obama’s past? | We Are Change Utah on Sun, 21st Mar 2010 11:12 pm
[...] (USWGO Alt. News)Author: Brian D. Hill [...]